CHAPTER – 8
(Chapter revised vide ACS NO. 11 OF 2002)
LIMITATIONS
OF ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTION OF RAILS
PREAMBLE
Every scientific
method/technique/equipment functions on certain principles and its
applicability depends upon fulfillment of preconditions necessary to be
satisfied. It accordingly implies that
USFD examination is based on certain guiding principles and its flaw detection
success depends upon thorough understanding of the governing factors.
Thus,
the limitations being mentioned are not per-se the deficiency of the USFD
technique rather in the existing arrangement under field conditions the
equipment utilised incorporates facility only for specified defects. This aspect may be kept in view and the
technique is to be pursued accordingly.
Limitations
in respect of rail examination considering the various arrangements presently
available have been elaborated below.
It may also be mentioned here that limitations with regard to AT welding
i.e. defects in web foot junction half moon cracks, vertical defects in web
portion etc. are no longer limitations of the USFD equipments since in the
newly developed equipment special probes have been provided for detection of
these defects.
8.1 (i) To detect the defect
efficiently, ultrasonic beam is to be directed towards the flaw
perpendicularly, otherwise, the reflected beam may not be received by the
receiver crystal, resulting in absence/reduction in amplitude of flaw signal in
the CRT. Cracks normally have facets
and hence even under misorientation provide reflecting surfaces leading to flaw
indication.
(ii)
For detection of defects in rails, probes having incidence
angle 0°, 70° (F), 70° (B), 37° (F), and 37° (B) have been provided in the USFD
trolley. The angles have been chosen in
a manner so as to detect defects which are generally observed during service
and have been the cause of rail fractures.
The section of rail which is
scanned by each type of probe has been indicated in Fig. 2(A), 2(B), 2(C) and
2(D)
For detection of defects
originating from Gauge Face Corner, a dedicated test set-up has been
developed. This set-up incorporates
three 70° probes covering approx. The
full width of the rail head and a set of two 45° probes. The area scanned by this arrangement is
shown in Fig.2(E). A defect located at 5mm from the corner is detectable using
this equipment.
All
commonly observed defects in rails are detectable by the above
arrangement. In the event of gross mis-orientation
of defect at times it may not be amenable for detection, however such
situations are rare.
(iii)
Severe pipe in the rail may give indication of flaw echo by
0° probe, But in case of hairline or fine central shrinkage (pipe), negligible
drop occurring in bottom signal may remain unnoticed by the USFD operator. (Ref
Fig-23).
(iv)
For detection of bolt hole cracks, 37° probe have been
provided. This is because the cracks
emanating from bolt holes are generally oblique and propagate in the zig-zag
manner. However, bolt hole cracks are
also detectable by using 0° probe since they obstruct the path of sound waves
and lead to drop/loss of back wall echo.
37° probes have been provided
both in forward and backward direction.
Forward probes detect defects in second and fourth quadrant where as
back ward probes detect cracks in 1st and 3rd
quadrant. At fish plated joint, as
shown in figure 16, if the cracks are not favourably oriented detection may not
be possible. Similarly, if the cracks
are propagating vertically downwards or upwards, detection is not
possible. In case of double rail
testers which do not have 37° probes, detection is possible by 0° probe.
Under such situations if the
cracks are so located that they are unable to be scanned by 0° probes,
initially due to smaller size, such cracks may not be detected.
(v)
If sensitivity of the machine is poor or battery gets
discharged the operator may miss the flaw signal. Hence, it is essential to ensure full charging of the battery.
(vi)
The ultrasonic probes used
in the rail testers have a frequency of 4MHz (longitudinal wave) and 2 MHz
(transverse waves). Therefore, cracks
lesser than 0.8mm size cannot be detected by the present arrangement.
The sizes & frequency of the
probes employed in the single rail tester/double rail tester are as under.
S. No. |
Probe type |
Size of crystal |
Shape of crystal |
Frequency |
1. |
0° (Double crystal) |
18mm or 18mm x 18mm |
Circular square |
4MHz |
2. |
70° (Single crystal) |
20mm or 20mm x 20mm |
Circular sqaure |
2MHz |
3. |
37° (Single crystal) |
20mm or 20mm x 20mm |
Circular sqaure |
2MHz |
(vii)
Rails having rust, pitting, hogging, battering of rail end,
misalignment of joints, scabs, wheel burns and other surface imperfections
restrict proper acoustic coupling between probe and rail table and may not permit
detection of flaws.
When ever such defects are
encountered, loss of back wall echo or an alarm signal is obtained. This indicates that defects if any below
these patches may remain undetected. Under
such circumstances hand probing may be done.
8.2
Testing
of SEJs, CMS crossing, points and crossings
Testing of these
components is accomplished in the same way as rails. However due to its specific shape near the nose, it is difficult
to move the trolley for testing and achieve accustic coupling. Therefore except the stock rail, the balance
portion is not amenable for detection by USFD trolley. Under such circumstances, hand probing is
required to be carried out according to the procedure laid down in the manual
for points and crossing or in the USFD manual (chapter 11 & 12).
Since the testing of SEJ, Points
and crossings specially in the nose portion poses practical problems during
USFD examination of the track, it is essential to carry out thorough testing of
these items before they are put in to service and also before they are taken up
for reclamation.
8.3
Testing
on sharp curves gradients, slack gauge etc.
The USFD trolley has been
designed to operate under normal conditions of gauge. In the event of dimensional variations in the gauge and also at
sharp curves it is possible that the probes are not properly contacting the
rail surface. This is indicated by loss
of backwall echo or also by alarm provided in DRTs for backwall drop. Wherever it is not possible to ensure proper
acoustic coupling due to these reasons, testing by hand probing or by single
rail tester may be resorted to.
Acoustic coupling needs to be ensured under all circumstances to detect
the flaws.
II The
existing figure no. 2 given in the list of
figures may be replaced by figure 2(A), 2(B), 2(C), 2(D) &
2(E). Descriptions of these figures is
given below:
(i)
Figure 2(A) Area covered during USFD examination by normal
(0°) probe.
(ii)
Figure 2(B) Area covered during USFD examination by 70°
probe.
(iii)
Figure 2(c) Area covered during USFD examination by 37°
probe.
(iv)
Figure 2(D) Area covered during USFD examination by 70°,
1.25 MHz probe in flange testing of AT welds.
(v)
Figure 2 (E) Area covered during USFD examination by gauge
face corner detection equipment.