ANNEXURE VI

PRESCRIBED PERIODICITY OF ULTRASONIC TESTING OF RAILS FOR CONVENTIONAL TESTING

1. According to the latest knowledge on the subject, the periodicity of ultrasonic testing of rails should depend on the traffic density on the line in GMT, the rail section and grade of steel and whether the threshold value in GMT (i.e. the stipulated service life) for the particular rail has been exceeded or not, it has also been considered logical that, except for high speed routes, no distinction should be made between various groups of routes in determining the frequency of ultrasonic testing.

2. Railway Board have issued following guidelines on this subject :

 (i) After the initial testing of rails (in rail manufacturing plant), the first retesting need not normally be done until the rail has undergone 15% of its stipulated service life in GMT.

Whenever rails are not tested in rail manufacturing plant, the test  free period shall not be applicable and the rail testing shall be done at the periodicity given below right from the day of its laying in field. (Para 2 (i) revised vide ACS No.10 of 2002)

(ii) The frequency of testing, after 15% of the stipulated service life and up to completion of the stipulated service life, would vary with the rail section and grade and the traffic density on the line. To arrive at a rational frequency of testing on any route, the total stipulated service life of a particular rail section be divided by 8, which will be taken as the maximum GMT to be carried between successive tests (say 'X' GMT). Actual testing will depend upon the GMT carried by the route per annum (say 'Y' GMT). The period in years, between successive tests could be worked out by dividing the former by the latter (i.e., X/Y). The periodicity of testing for different standard rail sections and grades on BG & MG for various GMT levels are shown below for guide line. (Testing intervals have been rounded of to the nearest multiple of three months).

(A) BROAD GAUGE

Rail section and grade in UTS and the threshold values in GMT

 Traffic density (GMT/year)

90 Ib (72) (250)

901b(90) (375)

52 kg (72) (350)

52 kg (90) (525)

60 kg (72) (550)

60 kg (90) (880)

Below 10

3 years

3 years

3 years

3 years

3 years

3 years

10-20

2 years

3 years

2.75 years

3 years

3 years

3 years

20-30

1 year

1.75 years

1.75 years

2.5 years

2.75 years

3 years

30-40

9 months

1.25 years

1 year

1.5 years

'1.75 years

2.75 years

40-50

6 months

1 year

9 months

1.25 years

1.5 years

2 years

Over 50

6 months

9 months

9 months

1 year

1 25 years

2 years

(B) METRE GAUGE

Traffic density (GMT/year)

501b (72) (100)

601b (72) (125)

751b(72) (150)

75lb (90) (225)

90lb(72) (250)

901b(90) (375)

Below 1.5

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

1.5-2.5

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

2.5-5.0

3 years

4 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

Over 5.0

2.5 years

3 years

3.5 years

5 years

5 years

5 years

(iii) The peiodicities given above shall be halved when the actual traffic carried on the line has crossed the threshold values indicated in each case.

(iv) For high speed routes, which will be maintained to track tolerances as per RDSO's Report No. C&M-1, the minimum frequency of testing shall be once a year for the period after 15% service life of the rail and upto completion of the stipulated service life. Thereafter, it shall be once in six months.

(v) For all other routes, the minimum frequency of testing shall be once in three years for BG and five years for MG regardless of traffic carried.

(vi) The frequency prescribed above for rails would equally apply to welds in the track, with the proviso that the use of

80probe may be dispensed with if alumine-thermic weld failures are less than 0.5% of the population of welds in block section since the last testing.

(vii) If the total number of rails with IMR and REM defects detected during ultrasonic testing and/or actual fractures exceed one per km in a block section since the last testing, the frequency of testing shall be once in two months or after passage of 8 GMT of traffic, whichever is earlier.

Note: Notwithstanding what has been stipulated above, the Chief Engineers may authorise ultrasonic testing at closer intervals, or on adhoc basis, in case any incidence of premature failure of rails or abnormal increase in fractures is deemed to warrant such action.